Difference with City is you can see it has a future. Major investment in the team obviously but also training, scouting, overseas partnerships, i think there was talk of stadium development too? They brought in Txiki who brought in Pep and to me it feels like a huge club in the making.
Chelsea still feels a bit like a Billionaire's toy, although Chelsea look to have something going right with their youth/scouting.
It might just be Roman's hands on approach vs the Sheikh's hands off that makes me feel that way though.
But in the short term, City are the "top" club right now for me. Not the biggest, not the most historic but if you're a coach looking for a job I'd choose City. The squad is there, plenty of young players in the wings too, cash to spend, what's not to like?